Amanda Seyfried claims she was pressured to rent a bodyguard after her controversial remarks about Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
Chatting with British GQ in an interview revealed Monday, the “Housemaid” actress recounted how her description of the conservative political activist as “hateful” after his capturing loss of life at a college final fall sparked a major response from critics, in the end inflicting her to concern for her personal security.
Addressing the controversy, she advised the outlet, “A, I’ve the best to specific my emotions, and B, do it in a manner that is not essentially imply.”
“However there’s simply an inordinate concern and hatred and impulse to denigrate and tear down,” she added. “And I skilled a really small fraction of that.”
“I would like my kids to have the ability to really feel protected expressing their opinions so long as they don’t seem to be dangerous,” Seyfried, 40, continued.
“So I am like, ‘What do I do? What do I say?’ After which abruptly I discover myself with a fucking bodyguard on the airport and I am like, “That is loopy. » » she concluded.
Kirk died after being shot whereas on stage at Utah Valley College throughout a cease on his U.S. comeback tour. He was 31 years outdated.
He and his spouse, Erika Kirk, shared two kids: a daughter who might be 4 in August and a 2-year-old son.
Just like the Kirks, Seyfried shares two kids together with her husband Thomas Sadoski: daughter Nina, 9, and son Thomas, 5.
After his first remark about Kirk following his loss of life, Seyfried defended his assertion, writing on Instagram: “We overlook the nuance of humanity. »
“I may be indignant in regards to the misogyny and racist rhetoric and ALSO utterly agree that the homicide of Charlie Kirk was completely disturbing and deplorable in each manner possible,” she continued. “Nobody ought to must endure this degree of violence.”
She concluded: “This nation is affected by too many mindless and violent deaths and shootings. Can we at the least agree on this?”
The Oscar-nominated actress additionally refused to apologize for social media feedback throughout a December 2025 interview with Who What Put on.
“I imply, rattling, I commented on one factor. I stated one thing that was primarily based on precise actuality, precise photos and precise quotes,” the “Imply Ladies” actress advised the outlet.
“What I stated was fairly darn factual, and I’m free to have an opinion, in fact,” she added.