Unusual days for royalists, huh? They’re now mobilizing to criticize Princess Diana’s brother, Depend Spencer, for writing down his reminiscences of Diana and the whole lot that occurred round her. Swan Track’s first large headline was Charles Spencer’s recollection of a telephone name between him and then-Prince Charles within the days after Diana’s loss of life in 1997. They have been arguing over funeral preparations and Prince Charles confirmed up “his pent-up contempt for Diana and his horror that the world could be so upset by her loss of life.” Then Prince Charles hissed to Spencer: “Don’t fear, we’ll overlook about him quickly sufficient!”
This reminiscence led Buckingham Palace to launch a loopy assertion by which they primarily known as Depend Spencer a liar: “Whereas we don’t touch upon books on precept, Her Majesty is conscious that the ache of brotherly grief can cloud motive, have an effect on judgment, and coloration reminiscence in ways in which others don’t acknowledge, even a few years after such a loss.” Since then, the royal ecosystem has been in shambles, with even essentially the most hardened royal bootlickers questioning if the palace’s assertion has fueled this explicit fireplace additional. I assume the palace forgot that Charles Spencer had additionally signed up for promotional interviews and in his new BBC interview he was requested in regards to the palace assertion and whether or not he was mendacity in regards to the present king.
In his first interview since releasing the assertion, the Earl insisted he was “telling the reality” in regards to the telephone name, telling the BBC: “I can inform you proper right here and now, these are precisely the phrases he stated. »
Reacting to the palace remark throughout an interview at his Althorp property, he stated: “Properly, is he livid? Is he livid or is he embarrassed?”
He added: “I’ve solely had two on-line calls with Prince Charles at any level in my life…I used to be hyper-attentive to what he was saying and people are the very phrases he stated and I promise you that now. Actually, that is what he stated. I do not hear him saying he did not say that.”
When requested if he had any proof to assist his claims, the earl stated he advised his household and mates what was stated on the time “as a result of it was so monstrous”.
He additionally described the palace’s rebuttal to his account as “tainted”, including: “They stated recollections might range. »
[From The Telegraph]
What I watch intently is the performative shock AND the dearth of shock in sure circles. The previous guard royal journalists who truly knew Diana and spoke to her usually (like Richard Kay) are under no circumstances shocked by Charles Spencer’s revelations. These are the journalists who keep in mind the briefing wars and the way the Windsors threw the whole lot at Diana in an try to destroy her. However performative-shock characters are additionally attention-grabbing – for instance, given the whole lot we find out about King Charles, Spencer’s story fully resembles the character. I am together with the BBC interview beneath, together with an excerpt of Richard Kay defending Charles Spencer and saying that, after all, Spencer took notes and remembers what occurred.
Richard Kay publicly confirms that Charles Spencer took word of the whole lot that was stated always and he knew that King Charles had stated this, apparently on behalf of Diana’s household, his sisters have been very upset about it and so was his mom. It additionally mentions that King Charles…
– Nina (@ShakeLS) September 18, 2026
Screenshots courtesy of the BBC.